DVD Covers  - Blu-ray Covers  - R1DB Cover Art
Cover Forums | Subscribe | Credits | Covers



Quick Member Login:
Forgot password?
Navigation:
Forum Statistics:
Forum Members: 72,579
Total Threads: 8,709
Total Posts: 108,056


There are 112 users
currently browsing forums.
You don't appear to be registered. Click here to register
Old 10-31-2007, 12:42 PM   #1
Stalker
 
miketardis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,349
Credits: 36
Style:

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The Hills Have Eyes (2006)

THE HILLS HAVE EYES (2006)
What was the point of this remake? Aja and Maddellena said in the documentary that the atomic testing stuff (I'm not spoiling anything, its all over the previews and the cliche main titles) was a justification to remake the film. That really added nothing to the film and in fact took away from the suspense and the characters. The original cannibals were developed characters. Here, we don't get to know any of them. As a result, there is no real resonance in any of their gory comeuppances (which were really a let down in the unrated version I saw) - they were prosthetics even before the gunshots, pickaxes, and dog fangs. The OTHER family was better drawn. The kids (Dan Byrd, Emilie de Raven, and Vinessa Shaw) gave good performances. Kathleen Quinlan was good as usual. Ted Levine finally gave a performance where I forgot he was "the guy from THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS" though that may be just because he looks so different from back then. The father of the baby got to do more here but he's just as uninteresting a fellow to follow around as in the original (even with the added stuntwork).
Other than the uninterestingly developed atomic subplot, the film follows the original so well that there is no suspense. Pretty much everyone dies who is supposed to.

SPOILER:

(thus, the deaths of the members of the normal family are not shockingly unexpected as they were in the original - Dee Wallace's death in the original was a surprise). Everyone who we know are going to survive, does so.

While the film is pretty much a faithful "remake" of the original, it is also stylistically basically an American remake of Aja's HIGH TENSION. Even the DVD menus of the the two films look almost exactly the same!
Unlike the remake of DAWN OF THE DEAD, the THE HILLS HAVE EYES remake is not even entertaining on its own apart from the original.
I pretty much avoided the remakes of TEXAS CHAINSAW and AMITYVILLE HORROR and did not bother to read the reviews. Can anyone recommend them or do you think I'd find the same flaws in them that I found off-putting in HILLS.
miketardis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2008, 05:42 PM   #2
Fish
 
little_me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 4
Credits: 0
Style:

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I liket it, though. Just the right amount of gore, guts, screaming and blood!
What else could horror buffs want?
little_me is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Thanks for visiting, hope you found DVD Covers, DVD Movies Covers, Blu-Ray Covers, DVD Cover Downloads useful

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:19 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright R1DB.com