[saq428]

Anyone seen it yet, and what are your opinions?

[movieman]

No I have not seen it yet. But I heard they cgi the hell out of it, and even the background was a little funny in a lot of scenes.

but What I'd like to now is if nick cage can still solve almost the whole story with one clue

[true]

This movie was totally lame. Like part 1, Cage's character does all the work and all Harris' character does is follow him 10 steps behind, and at the near-end, attempts to steal it.

A couple things/pet peeves that made this movie unwatchable for me: Impossible scenarios like the scene where he kidnapped the president, sneaks into the oval office, car chase scenes and shootouts. Might as well have flying cars and magic bullets too.
And stuff like being able to hack into anything and everything with a couple of keystrokes annoys the shit out of me. For example, the computer guy was able to unlock doors by "hacking it" -- ya my door is hooked up on my network to be "hackable". Everything was just too "convenient" for me to actually enjoy it.

Part 1 was lame, but at least entertaining. This one had less history stuff.

[sonic99]

i myself enjoyed the film ok it has plot holes and everything what true said is mostly right but i think this film is good to let yourself go and relax take your brain out and just have fun